Website safety reportLast scanned Jun 18, 2026

Is Blooket Safe?

Ads, Trackers, Security & UX Review

6 public pages rendered. The score, signal cards, and evidence tables below show what appeared in the browser sample.

Status

Scan completed

Host

blooket.com

Confidence

72/100

Observed safety score

Moderate observed risk

Ad risk: Low
55/ 100

Signal mix

Mixed
AdsLow
TrackingElevated
SecurityElevated

0

Ad domains

6

Tracker domains

72/100

Confidence

Host

blooket.com

Education and student tools

Hosting

CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US

104.18.22.11; AS13335

TLS

Enabled

Google Trust Services

Requests

331

6 third-party domains observed

Risk map

What the scan noticed

Four quick signals first. Evidence stays grouped by risk area.

Elevated

Data risk

Tracking signals

Elevated

Security posture

Header gaps

Moderate-low

User experience

Low friction

Low

Ad risk

Low ad pressure

Data risk6 3rd-party domains seen.Elevated

Meaning

The rendered scan observed 6 tracker-domain matches, led by cdn-cookieyes.com (42), fonts.gstatic.com (15), unpkg.com (15) and 3 more, and up to 5 cookies across the sampled public pages.

Evidence

  • 6 3rd-party domains seen.
  • 6 tracker-domain matches were classified as known tracker patterns in the browser sample.
  • 5 total cookies and 0 3rd-party cookies seen.
  • 2 privacy, terms, help, safety, or opt-out style links were discovered.
  • The enrichment sample included visible cookie, tracking, or analytics language.
Security postureCSP header was not observed in the fetched response.Elevated

Meaning

Security posture is based on observed TLS, response headers, mixed-content behavior, and usable external-check output.

Evidence

  • CSP header was not observed in the fetched response.
  • TLS connected with TLSv1.3; issuer: Google Trust Services.
  • HSTS header seen.
  • X-Frame header was not observed in the fetched response.
  • No mixed-content requests seen in the rendered browser sample.
  • Structured-data types observed during enrichment: Organization.
User experienceNo notification permission prompts seen.Moderate-low

Meaning

The rendered public-page sample loaded with HTTP 200 and 8242 visible text characters.

Evidence

  • No notification permission prompts seen.
  • 8242 rendered text characters seen.
  • Fetched page returned HTTP 200.
  • Sampled page titles: Blooket - Fun, Free, Educational Games for Everyone; Privacy Policy | Blooket; Terms of Service | Blooket.
Ad risk0 ad-domain matches were classified as known ad-network patterns in the browser sample.Low

Meaning

The rendered scan did not observe obvious ad-network domain matches across 6 sampled public pages.

Evidence

  • 0 ad-domain matches were classified as known ad-network patterns in the browser sample.
  • 331 browser requests seen.
  • 4 static script domains seen across the enrichment sample.
  • No pop-up window calls seen in the automated pass.
Evidence

Scan evidence at a glance

Key signals first, with important limits kept close so the report stays useful without overstating certainty.

Captured evidence

Direct observations

6

Pages sampled

Rendered browser pass

331

Requests

6 third-party - 0 ad - 6 tracker

5

Cookies

0 third-party

Headers

Security posture

HSTS yes - CSP no - X-Frame no

Below

Request volume

331 vs 628 median

Seen

Evidence

Third-party domain count was below the same-cluster...

Seen

Evidence

Tracker-domain count was below the same-cluster med...

Scan boundary

Important limits

Can vary

School context

Policy, consent, paid features

Can change

Ad context

Location, consent, A/B tests

External checks

Source signals

Clear

Safe Browsing

Google Transparency Report Safe Browsing status returned no threat matches for 1 URL

Flagged

HTTP Observatory

MDN HTTP Observatory returned grade B+ with score 80 and 1 failed checks

Ads and trackers

Ads and trackers found in the scan

Observed domains are grouped by company or tool, purpose, request volume, and the sampled pages where they appeared.

5

Entities

Companies or tools grouped from observed domains.

3

Categories

Most active: Consent management.

93

Requests

Classified ad or tracker requests in the sample.

6/6

Pages seen

Sampled pages with at least one classified signal.

Activity by purpose

Grouped by evidence

Consent management

2 entities / 2 domains

48

Tracking and measurement

2 entities / 3 domains

40

Tag management

1 entity / 1 domain

5

Top observed entities

Cdn Cookieyes

Consent management

tracker

42

requests

6/6

pages

cdn-cookieyes.com0.9% web prevalence

Google

Tracking and measurement

tracker

25

requests

5/6

pages

fonts.googleapis.comfonts.gstatic.com41% web prevalence

Unpkg

Tracking and measurement

tracker

15

requests

5/6

pages

unpkg.com4.1% web prevalence

Cookieyes

Consent management

tracker

6

requests

6/6

pages

log.cookieyes.com0.9% web prevalence

Google

Tag management

tracker

5

requests

5/6

pages

googletagmanager.com59% web prevalence

Tracker-domain evidence

Raw domains and request paths classified as tracker matches in rendered samples.

6

domains

93

classified requests

6

pages with matches

cdn-cookieyes.com

Matched DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar tracker patterns during the rendered public-page sample. Observed on 6 rendered pages. Request types: script, fetch, image.

42 requests

Seen in sample

6 sampled pages

Request types

scriptfetchimage

Context

Prevalence: 0.9%

Matched hosts

cdn-cookieyes.com

Domain matched DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar tracker patterns.

fonts.gstatic.com

Matched DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar tracker patterns during the rendered public-page sample. Observed on 5 rendered pages. Request types: font.

15 requests

Seen in sample

5 sampled pages

Request types

font

Context

Prevalence: 41%

Matched hosts

fonts.gstatic.com

Domain matched DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar tracker patterns.

unpkg.com

Matched DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar tracker patterns during the rendered public-page sample. Observed on 5 rendered pages. Request types: script, fetch.

15 requests

Seen in sample

5 sampled pages

Request types

scriptfetch

Context

Prevalence: 4.1%

Matched hosts

unpkg.com

Domain matched DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar tracker patterns.

fonts.googleapis.com

Matched DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar tracker patterns during the rendered public-page sample. Observed on 5 rendered pages. Request types: stylesheet.

10 requests

Seen in sample

5 sampled pages

Request types

stylesheet

Context

Prevalence: 39%

Matched hosts

fonts.googleapis.com

Domain matched DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar tracker patterns.

log.cookieyes.com

Matched DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar tracker patterns during the rendered public-page sample. Observed on 6 rendered pages. Request types: ping.

6 requests

Seen in sample

6 sampled pages

Request types

ping

Context

Prevalence: 0.9%

Matched hosts

log.cookieyes.com

Domain matched DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar tracker patterns.

googletagmanager.com

Matched DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar tracker patterns during the rendered public-page sample. Observed on 5 rendered pages. Request types: script.

5 requests

Seen in sample

5 sampled pages

Request types

script

Context

Prevalence: 59%

Matched hosts

googletagmanager.com

Domain matched DuckDuckGo Tracker Radar tracker patterns.

Alternatives

Blooket alternatives to compare before choosing

These options are category-relevant comparison leads for Blooket. Each card separates why it is comparable and when it fits.

Gimkit

gimkit.com

Visit

Why compare it

Gimkit is in the education and student tools category and has rendered scan evidence, making it useful for comparing ads, trackers, cookies, and security posture.

Best fit

Use it as a comparison point when you want another option with lower observed risk in the same evidence categories.

Scan-backed comparison

Ads: LowData: ElevatedSecurity: Moderate

ClassLink

classlink.com

Visit

Why compare it

ClassLink is in the education and student tools category and has rendered scan evidence, making it useful for comparing ads, trackers, cookies, and security posture.

Best fit

Use it as a comparison point when you want another option with higher observed risk in the same evidence categories.

Scan-backed comparison

Ads: ElevatedData: HighSecurity: Moderate-low

Zearn

zearn.org

Visit

Why compare it

Zearn is in the education and student tools category and has rendered scan evidence, making it useful for comparing ads, trackers, cookies, and security posture.

Best fit

Use it as a comparison point when you want another option with higher observed risk in the same evidence categories.

Scan-backed comparison

Ads: HighData: HighSecurity: Moderate-low

Kiddle

kiddle.co

Visit

Why compare it

Kiddle is in the education and student tools category and has rendered scan evidence, making it useful for comparing ads, trackers, cookies, and security posture.

Best fit

Use it as a comparison point when you want another option with higher observed risk in the same evidence categories.

Scan-backed comparison

Ads: ModerateData: ElevatedSecurity: High
FAQs

Blooket safety questions answered

Is Blooket safe to use?

Latest scan of Blooket across 6 public pages captured 331 browser requests, 6 third-party domains, 0 ad-domain matches, 6 tracker-domain matches, and 5 cookies (0 third-party). Header gaps: CSP, X-Frame-Options. External checks: Safe Browsing clear; HTTP Observatory flagged. This is not a guarantee of safety; it is a time-bound public-page evidence report.

What did Blockify actually observe on Blooket?

Key observations from the rendered sample: 331 browser requests, 6 third-party domains, 0 ad-domain matches, 6 tracker-domain matches, and 0 third-party cookies. Header gaps: CSP, X-Frame-Options.

Does Blooket use ads or trackers?

The rendered public-page scan found 0 ad-domain matches and 6 tracker-domain matches across 6 sampled pages. The most active matches were cdn-cookieyes.com (42), fonts.gstatic.com (15), unpkg.com (15) and 3 more.

What should schools check before using Blooket?

Use the public-page privacy and security signals here, then compare student-data terms, SSO settings, roster access, retention policy, parent consent, and district controls.

Why does the report show blooket.com instead of another domain?

We tested blooket.com because it is the website address selected for this report.

What should I compare before choosing Blooket alternatives?

Compare the same evidence categories: rendered requests, ad-domain matches, tracker-domain matches, cookies, security headers, external checks, and whether each alternative fits the same user task.

Can Blockify guarantee that this website is safe?

No. Blockify can reduce ads, trackers, and pop-ups in the browser, but no scan can guarantee every page, account flow, future visit, or personalized state is safe.